Simple Agreement For Future Equity Calculator

It just seems to use it as such a simple tool instead of fiddling with a note or semen serial documents. Here is a summary of the terms in the SAFE computer. Now enter the examples of the SAFE computer. Now let`s look at the following scenario to better understand how SAFE post-money changes will work in the event of equity financing. The important effects of using post-Money SAFEs are therefore that SAFes no longer water each other. The founders bear the burden of dilution, but not the other owners of SAFE. However, as noted above, the SAFE post-money property is owned by all other SAFEs, but not after Series A. Thus, FAS is like their own round table, and they are watered down by Series A and any increase in the pool of options related to such equity financing. In addition, after money-SAFEs make things easier, since the pool of options for post-investment financing is no longer included in the pre-money calculations, because the amount of the increase in the pool of options at the time of the issuance of SAFEs is generally unknown. For example, if I only want to bring the first 100 100ks with a pre-payment of 900 dollars (10% equity) just to get things started, does it still make sense to use the SAFE and place the ceiling at 900ks? At Dorm Room Fund, we invest with unlimited SAFEs at no discounts, but with an MFN clause. This means that when converted into equity, founders end up having more of the business than if there was a cap or discount. If new investors buy shares for $1.00, it`s also Dorm Room Fund. Convert PRE-MONEY SAFEs to pre-money valuation.

Such a conversion makes it difficult to measure the amount of equity sold in the company as part of preferential equity financing. The reason is that the percentage sold in the financing depends on the number of other SAFes in the cycle, as well as the size of the pool of options linked to the financing cycle. This means that property and dilution values are more an informed estimate than a safe calculation. Another new function of the safe concerns a “prorgula” right. The original safe required the company to allow holders of safes to participate in the financing round after the financing round in which the safe was converted (for example. B if the safe is converted into series group preferred actuators, a secure holder – now holder of a Series A preferred share subseries – is allowed to acquire a proportionate portion of the Series B preferred share). While this concept is consistent with the original concept of safe, it made no sense in a world where safes were becoming independent funding cycles. Thus, the “old” pro-rata right is removed from the new safe, but we have a new model letter (optional) that offers the investor a proportional right in the preferential financing of Series A on the basis of the converted safe property of the investor, which is now much more transparent. Whether a start-up and an investor enter the letter with a safe will now be a choice that the parties will choose, and this may depend on a large number of factors. Factors to consider can (among other things) the amount of the safe purchase and the amount of future dilution that proportional duty can cause to the founders – an amount that can now be predicted with much greater accuracy if post-money safes are used. For a growing start-up, the company will probably find more money. As a start-up investor, I`m not interested in being reimbursed.

The risk associated with a start-up is high, so I hope that in the event of a high risk, there will be a potential for a strong upward trend. That is why I would like my SAFE to be “converted” to equity at a later date. Basically, as soon as someone decides to invest in the company in a “price cycle”, my SAFE becomes shares of the company. We just had another YC Demo Day and it turned out that our founders and venture capitalists needed help with the new simple deal after money for future equity (“SAFE”).

Comments are closed.